Protocols shouldn't set the deadline to block.timestamp as it can be manipulated by validators
https://github.com/Cyfrin/2023-07-beedle/blob/658e046bda8b010a5b82d2d85e824f3823602d27/src/Fees.sol#L36
deadline is set to block.timestamp
a validator can hold the transaction and the block it is eventually put into will be block.timestamp, so this offers no protection
Manual Review
Protocols should allow users interacting with AMMs to set expiration deadlines
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.