The report aims to optimize the project's codebase using these software paradigms:
Divide and Conquer (DaC)
Separation of Responsibilities (SoR)
Monolithic architectures might offer some advantages in terms of gas efficiency, but with growing project complexity, it's vital to prioritize maintainability and flexibility. A clear separation of concerns, coupled with a DaC approach, can offer significant benefits.
Recommendations:
1οΈβ£ Break down the responsibilities of Lender.sol into two distinct contracts:
PoolsManager.sol: Pool-related operations and management.
Lender.sol: Lending-specific operations and management.
2οΈβ£ For further modularity adoption:
ILender.sol & IPoolsManager.sol: Modularize events and easily grasp a view of the 2 contracts functions.
By adopting this restructured approach, each module will excel in its function, leading to a more robust and manageable system.
π§ Note β οΈ: The code below is just a template to guide you. It has not been tested and should not be relied upon. Moreover, while the intent is to simplify and reorganize, this restructuring might not be the most gas-efficient approach.
Lender.sol:
PoolsManager.sol:
ILender.sol:
IPoolsManager.sol:
DaC and SoR offer multiple benefits, including:
They make error detection more traceable, easier debugging.
Better readability when declaring the intentions of each part of the codebase.
If an error occurs, these paradigms can help prevent its propagation throughout the system.
Manual audit.
Solidity Visual Developer VSPlugin for visualizing function dependencies.
Allocate dedicated time during the development phase to strategic codebase design, emphasizing clarity and scalability. Such an approach, though possibly more time-consuming initially, long-term its more efficient for extensive projects like this one.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.