20,000 USDC
View results
Submission Details
Severity: gas
Valid

Use `storage` instead of `memory` for structs and arrays

Summary

When fetching data from a storage location, assigning the data to a memory variable causes all fields of the struct/array to be read from storage, which incurs a Gcoldsload (2,100 gas) for each field of the struct/array. If the fields are read from the new memory variable, they incur an additional MLOAD rather than a cheap stack read. Instead of declaring the variable with the memory keyword, declaring the variable with the storage keyword and caching any fields that need to be re-read in stack variables, will be much cheaper, only incurring the Gcoldsload for the fields actually read. The only time it makes sense to read the whole struct/array into a memory variable is if the full struct/array is being returned by the function, is being passed to a function that requires memory, or if the array/struct is being read from another memory array/struct.

Vulnerability Details

There are 10 instances of this issue.

View 10 Instances
File: src/Lender.sol
117: Loan memory loan = loans[loanId];
238: Pool memory pool = pools[poolId];
296: Loan memory loan = loans[loanId];
363: Loan memory loan = loans[loanId];
367: Pool memory pool = pools[poolId];
441: Loan memory loan = loans[loanId];
467: Loan memory loan = loans[loanId];
552: Loan memory loan = loans[loanId];
606: Loan memory loan = loans[loanId];
611: Pool memory pool = pools[poolId];
File Link Instance Count Instance Links
Lender.sol 10 117,238,296,363,367,441,467,552,606,611

Impact

42,000 gas

Tools Used

baudit: a custom static code analysis tool; manual review

Recommendations

Use storage instead of memory for structs and arrays.

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.