The utilization of ETH instead of WETH in the comments could potentially lead to confusion among users and developers.
The contract has been exclusively designed to operate with ERC20 tokens and is not equipped with functions to manage native ETH transactions. This discrepancy might misguide users into believing that the contract supports ETH transactions, potentially causing misconceptions and uncertainties.
No real impact to the logic of contract and funds, only for the comprehension of the contract's functionality.
Manual review.
Change ETH for WETH in the comments.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.