15,000 USDC
View results
Submission Details
Severity: gas
Valid

In comments is used ETH instead of WETH

Summary

The utilization of ETH instead of WETH in the comments could potentially lead to confusion among users and developers.

Vulnerability Details

The contract has been exclusively designed to operate with ERC20 tokens and is not equipped with functions to manage native ETH transactions. This discrepancy might misguide users into believing that the contract supports ETH transactions, potentially causing misconceptions and uncertainties.

Impact

No real impact to the logic of contract and funds, only for the comprehension of the contract's functionality.

Tools Used

Manual review.

Recommendations

Change ETH for WETH in the comments.

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.