Sparkn

CodeFox Inc.
DeFiFoundryProxy
15,000 USDC
View results
Previous Next
Submission Details
Severity: high
Valid

DAI Tokens at Risk Due to Lack of address(0) Check in distribute

tsar

Summary

The distribute function does not check if the winner is address(0). For some tokens Like USDC and USDT it does check internally if the sender and receiver are not address(0) and revert it (so it's not necessary for the function to check it), but the DAI token does not check for that and will not revert and send tokens to the 0 address.

Vulnerability Details

Since the dev described that the DAI token will be present in the contract the function _distribute should check if any of the winners are address(0).
Here is the DAI token code: https://etherscan.io/token/0x6b175474e89094c44da98b954eedeac495271d0f#code , the functions used to transfer the tokens internally does not check for the address(0) as seen here in the DAI contract:

function transfer(address dst, uint wad) external returns (bool) {
return transferFrom(msg.sender, dst, wad);
}
function transferFrom(address src, address dst, uint wad)
public returns (bool)
{
require(balanceOf[src] >= wad, "Dai/insufficient-balance");
if (src != msg.sender && allowance[src][msg.sender] != uint(-1)) {
require(allowance[src][msg.sender] >= wad, "Dai/insufficient-allowance");
allowance[src][msg.sender] = sub(allowance[src][msg.sender], wad);
}
balanceOf[src] = sub(balanceOf[src], wad);
balanceOf[dst] = add(balanceOf[dst], wad);
emit Transfer(src, dst, wad);
return true;
}

Impact

DAI tokens could be permanently lost if sent to address(0) because lack of checking

Tools Used

Manual review, Etherscan

Recommendations

Add a built in check if any of the winners are 0 address because not all tokens do that check internally, specially DAI which the dev explicitly commented that it is going to be used.

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.