However, the use of a loop counter without initialization (for (uint256 i; ...) might lead to unexpected behavior https://github.com/Cyfrin/2023-08-sparkn/blob/0f139b2dc53905700dd29a01451b330f829653e9/src/Distributor.sol#L128
It might lead to unexpected behavior.
If you see a statement like for (uint256 i; ...)
in Solidity, it's considered incorrect syntax and should be corrected to for (uint256 i = 0; ...).
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.