The 'secret' password is actually stored publicly in the contracts storage and can easily be retrieved, the private keyword deals only with readability from other smart contracts on chain.
the 32 byte password will be stored in the second slot of the contract storage. So this slot will contain the password and can easily be retrieved off chain.
The Contract is completely unsafe for use as any password is easily retrievable by anybody.
Foundry
Firstly, delete the @notice comment' @notice This contract allows you to store a private password that others won't be able to see. ' which is misleading and could result in end users trusting the contract to store their password.
You should not need to return the password itself from the smart contract. A better way is is to store only the hash of the password on chain.
If you truly need to be able to return the password itself, you can encrypt the password off chain in such a way that you as the owner know how to decrypt it, or you will need to use some off chain secret schema. but there is no way to securely store a password on chain which can be retrieved by the owner without any off chain aspect.
Private functions and state variables are only visible for the contract they are defined in and not in derived contracts. In this case private doesn't mean secret/confidential
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.