Submission Details
Severity:
save gas by using require instead of validate by if statement and revert
Summary
Vulnerability Details
if (msg.sender != s_owner) {
revert PasswordStore__NotOwner();
}
The gas cost for this code can be broken down as follows:
The gas cost of evaluating the conditional statement.
The gas cost of executing the revert function.
Impact
unnecessary gas cost
Tools Used
foundry testing
Recommendations
Using require instead of if statement then revert can optimize gas usage. When using require, gas is consumed only if the condition is not met,
require(msg.sender == s_owner, "NotOwner");
Updates
Rewards breakdown
nSLOC
20This contest has a flat reward structure with the following payouts:
100 EXP
20 EXP
2 EXP
Live
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
Appeals
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals Review
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.