Sensitive Data Exposure via Private State Variables in Solidity Contract
The PasswordStore
smart contract is designed to allow a user to store a password in a private state variable, with the intention of hiding the password from unauthorized viewers. However, due to the inherent transparency of blockchain data, the password can still be accessed by individuals with the necessary skills and tools, thus leading to sensitive data exposure.
Visibility Misconception: The contract uses a private state variable s_password
to store the password, which only prevents other contracts from accessing it directly. However, all data on the blockchain is public, and the private
visibility modifier does not hide the data from being viewed on the blockchain.
Function Restrictions: The contract provides a function getPassword
which checks if the caller is the owner before returning the password. While this is a good practice, it only serves to restrict access at the function level and doesn't prevent the underlying data from being viewed directly on the blockchain.
Event Leakage: The contract emits an event SetNetPassword
whenever the password is updated. Though the event does not contain the new password, it signals to potential attackers that the password has been changed, which might not be desirable.
The exposure of sensitive data like passwords could lead to unauthorized access if the password is used elsewhere. Additionally, the false assurance of privacy could lead to misuse or over-reliance on the contract for secure data storage, thereby potentially compromising user data.
Manual Review
Private functions and state variables are only visible for the contract they are defined in and not in derived contracts. In this case private doesn't mean secret/confidential
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.