The contract contains an internal function named _isActivePlayer(). This function is designed to check if the message sender (msg.sender) is an active player in the raffle. Despite being defined, this function is not called anywhere within the contract.
While this unused function does not directly introduce a security vulnerability, it represents dead code within the contract. This leads to several issues:
Increased Gas Cost and Contract Size: Including unused code increases the contract's deployment and execution cost unnecessarily.
Maintenance and Readability Issues: The presence of unused functions can cause confusion for developers and auditors who may spend time analyzing or maintaining code that has no impact on the contract's functionality.
Potential for Future Errors: If future modifications or extensions to the contract are made without proper understanding, this function could be incorrectly utilized, leading to unintended behaviors.
Removal of Unused Function: It is advisable to remove the _isActivePlayer() function from the contract to reduce gas costs, enhance clarity, and avoid potential future misuse.
Change to External Function: If the _isActivePlayer() function is intended to be used externally, it should be made external and documented accordingly.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.