Use the built-in transfer method for secure and safe Ether transfers in Solidity, as it automatically reverts the transaction in case of failure, preventing unintended loss of funds and enhancing contract security
The use of the sendValue method for Ether transfers can potentially expose the contract to security vulnerabilities due to its lack of automatic transaction reversal on failure, making it susceptible to reentrancy attacks and unintentional fund loss; using the secure transfer method is recommended.
The vulnerability could lead to reentrancy attacks, fund losses, and overall security risks, highlighting the importance of replacing sendValue with the more secure transfer method for Ether transfers in the contract.
Foundry and manual review
"Using transfer instead of sendValue is a security best practice, as it automatically reverts the transaction in case of failure, preventing potential Ether loss due to errors in the recipient contract, thus enhancing contract security."
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.