The winner is deterministic. The use of msg.sender, block.timestamp, block.difficulty and player. length is very predictable, especially to the miner.
The vulnerability in the contract arises from the deterministic nature of selecting a winner based on predictable factors. Specifically, the winner selection mechanism relies on:
msg.sender: The address of the sender.
block.timestamp: The current timestamp.
block.difficulty: The mining difficulty of the current block.
players.length: The number of players participating in the raffle.
These factors, particularly block.timestamp and block.difficulty, can be easily manipulated or predicted by miners, allowing them to influence the winner selection process.
The deterministic nature of the winner selection poses a significant vulnerability. Miners or malicious actors with knowledge of the underlying blockchain can manipulate these factors to predict or control the outcome of the raffle. This can lead to unfair and potentially fraudulent results, undermining the trustworthiness of the contract.
Manual
To enhance the fairness and security of the contract, the winner selection process should be made more unpredictable and resistant to manipulation. Using a more random source of entropy, such as Chainlink VRF (Verifiable Random Function), can significantly improve the randomness and fairness of the selection process. It is also essential to avoid using easily predictable or manipulable variables like block.timestamp and block.difficulty for critical operations like winner selection.
Root cause: bad RNG Impact: manipulate winner
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.