This vulnerability arises from the implicit assignment of the contract's ownership to the deploying address, due to inheriting from OpenZeppelin's Ownable contracts, without explicitly setting the owner in the constructor. This implicit behavior could lead to unauthorized access and control over owner-only functions if not properly managed.
In Solidity and the Ethereum smart contract ecosystem, the Ownable contract is a common pattern used to restrict access to certain functions to only the owner of the contract. The Ownable contract from OpenZeppelin assigns the ownership to the deployer of the contract by default. In the case of the PuppyRaffle contract, since it inherits from Ownable, this behavior is inherited as well. However, there is no explicit setting of the owner in the constructor, which could lead to potential mishandlings of contract ownership.
Unauthorized Access: If the deployer of the contract is not supposed to retain ownership, or if there is a need to change ownership right after deployment, the implicit setting of the owner could lead to unauthorized access and control over owner-only functions.
Lack of Clarity: Future developers or auditors might not be aware of who the owner is supposed to be, as it is not clearly set or documented in the contract, leading to potential security risks.
Insecure Deployment Practices: If the contract is deployed through an intermediary or a deployment script, the ownership might be unintentionally assigned to an undesired address, creating a vulnerability.
Explicitly set the owner of the contract in the constructor.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.