The contracts sets slippage and deadline parameters, but the appropriateness of these values may depend on the specific use case and market conditions. Inadequate or excessive values could lead to issues such as failed swaps or front-running attacks.
The comment for the deadline variable mentions that the deadline is set as the current block timestamp when this function is called, and it justifies this by stating that the function is triggered by a callback/keeper. However, the choice of the deadline value should be explained and justified within every external contract to ensure that it aligns with the intended security and operational requirements.
The undefined deadline value and its reliance on the current block timestamp can pose a risk if the transaction takes a significant amount of time to be included in a block, as it could fail due to a deadline being exceeded.
-manual code review
Implement a mechanism to handle cases where the deadline is exceeded, such as resubmitting the transaction with an updated deadline, to prevent transactions from getting "stuck" due to timing issues.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.