The SDLPoolCCIPControllerSecondary.sol
contract may be susceptible to a potential reentrancy vulnerability in the _ccipReceive
function. This vulnerability arises from the fact that the function interacts with external contracts before updating the shouldUpdate
state variable, potentially exposing the contract to reentrancy attacks.
The vulnerable portion of the code is in the _ccipReceive
function, which is susceptible to reentrancy.
The vulnerability lies in the order of operations within the _ccipReceive
function. Specifically, the state variable shouldUpdate is set to false after interacting with external contracts. This sequence of actions could potentially introduce a reentrancy vulnerability.
Reentrancy vulnerabilities occur when an external contract can call back into the current contract before the current execution context is completed. In this case:
solidity
The shouldUpdate
state variable is updated after interacting with external contracts, which can potentially lead to reentrancy vulnerabilities.
The state variable shouldUpdate
is set to false
before completing the rest of the code. If any part of the code following the state change involves external calls, it could potentially allow reentrancy attacks.
Here's a breakdown:
The function checks if shouldUpdate
is false
. If true, it proceeds to the next steps.
The state variable shouldUpdate
is then set to false
.
The rest of the code executes.
If the rest of the code involves external calls to other contracts, an attacker could potentially exploit this by deploying a malicious contract that repeatedly triggers the _ccipReceive
function before it completes, leading to unexpected behavior and potential security risks.
To mitigate this vulnerability, it is recommended to ensure that state changes are made after interacting with external contracts. This helps prevent reentrancy attacks by completing all external interactions before updating the contract's state.
A malicious actor could exploit this vulnerability by initiating a reentrancy attack through a crafted external contract. This could result in unexpected behavior and potential security risks.
Manual Code Review
To mitigate this vulnerability, it is recommended to ensure that state changes are made after interacting with external contracts to prevent reentrancy vulnerabilities. Here's the suggested modification
By updating the state variable shouldUpdate
after interacting with external contracts, the contract becomes less susceptible to reentrancy attacks. This modification ensures that external interactions are completed before updating the contract's state.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.