stake.link

stake.link
DeFiHardhatBridge
27,500 USDC
View results
Submission Details
Severity: medium
Invalid

Reentrancy attacks loop hole from the _ccipReceive function interacting with external contracts before updating the shouldUpdate state variable.

Summary

The SDLPoolCCIPControllerSecondary.sol contract may be susceptible to a potential reentrancy vulnerability in the _ccipReceive function. This vulnerability arises from the fact that the function interacts with external contracts before updating the shouldUpdate state variable, potentially exposing the contract to reentrancy attacks.

Vulnerability Details

The vulnerable portion of the code is in the _ccipReceive function, which is susceptible to reentrancy.
The vulnerability lies in the order of operations within the _ccipReceive function. Specifically, the state variable shouldUpdate is set to false after interacting with external contracts. This sequence of actions could potentially introduce a reentrancy vulnerability.

Reentrancy vulnerabilities occur when an external contract can call back into the current contract before the current execution context is completed. In this case:

solidity

/**
* @notice Processes a received message
* @dev handles incoming updates and reward distributions from the primary chain
* @param _message CCIP message
**/
function _ccipReceive(Client.Any2EVMMessage memory _message) internal override {
if (!shouldUpdate) revert UpdateConditionsNotMet();
// State change is made after interacting with external contracts
shouldUpdate = false;
// Rest of the code
}

The shouldUpdate state variable is updated after interacting with external contracts, which can potentially lead to reentrancy vulnerabilities.

The state variable shouldUpdate is set to false before completing the rest of the code. If any part of the code following the state change involves external calls, it could potentially allow reentrancy attacks.

Here's a breakdown:

  1. The function checks if shouldUpdate is false. If true, it proceeds to the next steps.

  2. The state variable shouldUpdate is then set to false.

  3. The rest of the code executes.

If the rest of the code involves external calls to other contracts, an attacker could potentially exploit this by deploying a malicious contract that repeatedly triggers the _ccipReceive function before it completes, leading to unexpected behavior and potential security risks.

To mitigate this vulnerability, it is recommended to ensure that state changes are made after interacting with external contracts. This helps prevent reentrancy attacks by completing all external interactions before updating the contract's state.

Impact

A malicious actor could exploit this vulnerability by initiating a reentrancy attack through a crafted external contract. This could result in unexpected behavior and potential security risks.

Tools Used

Manual Code Review

Recommendations and Vulnerability Details

To mitigate this vulnerability, it is recommended to ensure that state changes are made after interacting with external contracts to prevent reentrancy vulnerabilities. Here's the suggested modification

By updating the state variable shouldUpdate after interacting with external contracts, the contract becomes less susceptible to reentrancy attacks. This modification ensures that external interactions are completed before updating the contract's state.

/**
* @notice Processes a received message
* @dev handles incoming updates and reward distributions from the primary chain
* @param _message CCIP message
**/
function _ccipReceive(Client.Any2EVMMessage memory _message) internal override {
if (!shouldUpdate) revert UpdateConditionsNotMet();
// Ensure state changes are made after interacting with external contracts
shouldUpdate = false;
// Rest of the code
}
Updates

Lead Judging Commences

0kage Lead Judge over 1 year ago
Submission Judgement Published
Invalidated
Reason: Too generic

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.