The contract lacks proper handling of gas-related parameters in the sendDepositToken
function. This oversight may lead to failed transactions or excessive gas costs.
The absence of gas-related checks or handling in the sendDepositToken
function can result in failed transactions due to insufficient gas or excessive gas costs. This may lead to unpredictable behavior and potential financial losses for users.
Manual code review.
Implement proper handling of gas-related parameters in the sendDepositToken
function to ensure robust execution. Consider incorporating checks for gas limits and calculating gas fees within the function. Additionally, provide clear documentation on the expected gas-related parameters to guide users and avoid potential issues.
By adding a require
statement to check if there is sufficient gas remaining, developers can ensure that transactions are not attempted with insufficient gas. Additional checks and handling can be included based on specific requirements and considerations.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.