Beginner FriendlyFoundryNFT
100 EXP
View results
Submission Details
Severity: low
Invalid

`IS_HAPPY_HORSE` wrong returns value in definition

Summary

The IS_HAPPY_HORSE macro has a discrepancy in its specification, as it is designed to return a boolean value to the stack, but the returns declaration in the macro definition inaccurately states returns (0) instead of returns (1). This inconsistency could lead to confusion and potential errors in understanding the macro's behavior.

Vulnerability Details

The IS_HAPPY_HORSE macro is intended to evaluate whether a horse has been fed within a certain time frame and return a boolean value accordingly. However, the returns (0) specification implies that the macro does not return any item to the stack, which is not aligned with its actual behavior.

Impact

The incorrect specification in the returns declaration may cause confusion for developers and analysts trying to understand the macro's intended functionality. This discrepancy could lead to misinterpretations and potential implementation errors.

Tools Used

Manual review.

Recommendations

It is recommended to update the returns specification in the IS_HAPPY_HORSE macro definition to accurately reflect its behavior. The corrected version should be:

#define macro IS_HAPPY_HORSE() = takes (0) returns (1) {
// ... (macro body)
}
Updates

Lead Judging Commences

inallhonesty Lead Judge over 1 year ago
Submission Judgement Published
Invalidated
Reason: Incorrect statement

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.