The MAIN
macro in the HorseStore.huff
contract lacks a revert instruction in case none of the specified function signatures match the provided calldata. This absence of a revert mechanism may lead to unintended consequences, such as calling the wrong function, potentially causing security vulnerabilities or unintended state changes.
The MAIN
macro is designed to identify and execute the appropriate function based on the provided calldata. However, it does not include a revert instruction at the end to handle the scenario where none of the specified function signatures match the input. As a result, if a caller provides calldata with an unrecognized signature, the contract will proceed to execute the first function specified in the MAIN
macro (GET_TOTAL_SUPPLY
in this case).
The absence of a revert mechanism in the MAIN
macro could potentially lead to the execution of unintended functions. In a scenario where sensitive functions or state-changing operations are defined later in the macro, this could result in unexpected behavior or security vulnerabilities. It may allow malicious actors to trigger undesired actions within the contract.
Manual review.
It is recommended to add a revert instruction in theMAIN
macro to handle the case where none of the specified function signatures match the provided calldata. This will ensure that the contract reverts in case of unrecognized function signatures, preventing unintended execution and enhancing the overall security of the contract.
Any call data sent to the contract that doesn't contain a function selector will randomly mint a horse.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.