The code doesn't directly check for overflow or underflow. It simply increments or decrements the count without any boundary checks. If countMartenitsaTokensOwner[owner] is already 0 (meaning the address owns zero tokens), then subtracting 1 would result in an underflow. In Solidity, underflow with unsigned integers (like uint) wraps around to the maximum value instead of throwing an error. If countMartenitsaTokensOwner[owner] is already at its maximum value for an unsigned integer (uint256), adding 1 to it will cause an integer overflow. Solidity doesn't automatically revert when an overflow occurs, so without additional checks, the overflow will result in unexpected behavior and potential security vulnerabilities
file: src/MartenitsaToken.sol
function updateCountMartenitsaTokensOwner(address owner, string memory operation) external {
...
countMartenitsaTokensOwner[owner] += 1;
...
countMartenitsaTokensOwner[owner] -= 1;
...
}
An attacker may exploit an integer overflow to bypass access controls, mint tokens arbitrarily, or drain funds from the contract
Manual inspection
Use SafeMath library functions to perform arithmetic operations safely, ensuring that no overflow or underflow occurs.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.