Submission Details
Severity:
Solidity TSender protocol reference differs from the Yul and Huff implementation
Summary
Solidity TSender reference contract differs from the Yul and Huff version.
Vulnerability Details
In the line 37 of TSender reference contract, the return value of ERC20 token is checked, while the TSender protocol documentation clearly states it doesn't. Yul and Huff contracts don't have this issue. I'm aware this issue is out of scope of the audit, but this may have unwanted consequences in the future.
Impact
Broken tests when comparing Solidity version to Yul and Huff ones.
Tools Used
Manual research
Recommendations
Don't verify the return value in lines 38-40.
Prize pool breakdown
Total prize
15,000 USDC
nSLOC
25659 USDC / LOC
12,500 USDC
1,375 USDC
1,125 USDC
Live
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
Appeals
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals Review
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.