The Starklane
contract lacks a storage gap, which poses a risk of storage conflicts in future upgrades. This could lead to unintended overwriting of state variables, compromising the contract's integrity and functionality.
The contract does not include a storage gap, which is necessary for upgradeable contracts to prevent storage layout conflicts when new state variables are added.
The end of the contract's state variable declarations does not have a reserved storage gap.
Without a storage gap:
Future upgrades that introduce new state variables may overwrite existing ones, leading to unpredictable behavior or loss of critical data.
The absence of a storage gap undermines the upgradeability and safety mechanisms, potentially causing operational disruptions.
manual review
Introduce a reserved storage gap at the end of the state variable declarations to safeguard against future upgrades.
Known issue: Lightchaser
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.