The enableBridge
function in the smart contract allows the contract owner to enable or disable a specific feature by setting the _enabled
state variable. However, the function does not emit an event when this change occurs, which can lead to transparency issues and hinder off-chain monitoring.
The enableBridge
function allows the contract owner to change the state of the _enabled
variable without emitting an event. In smart contracts, events are critical for logging state changes that off-chain services, such as user interfaces or monitoring systems, rely on to track contract behavior. Without an event, there is no easy way for external systems to be notified of the change, which can lead to confusion or missed updates.
Transparency: The lack of event emission reduces the transparency of the contract's state changes, making it difficult for users and external systems to track when the bridge is enabled or disabled.
Off-Chain Monitoring: Off-chain services that rely on event logs to monitor contract activity will not be able to detect changes in the _enabled
state, potentially leading to incorrect assumptions or missed actions.
Manual Code Review: The absence of event emission was identified through a manual review of the smart contract's code.
To improve transparency and enable effective off-chain monitoring, it is recommended to emit an event whenever the _enabled
state is changed. This can be done by defining an event and emitting it within the enableBridge
function.
Please, do not suppose impacts, think about the real impact of the bug and check the CodeHawks documentation to confirm: https://docs.codehawks.com/hawks-auditors/how-to-determine-a-finding-validity A PoC always helps to understand the real impact possible.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.