Biconomy: Nexus
Non-unique attesters can cause denial of service
Lead Judging Commences
finding-ERC7848-add-duplicate-attester
Invalid, - Addition of attesters are admin only functionalities so if duplicate addresses are added it would consitute admin input/call validation. - ERC-7484 is in draft mode so we should not take it as the final EIP configuration yet. - Even if a mistake was made, removals can be performed by invoking `removeAttester` multiple times by the owner to completely remove a duplicate user. - In the [documentation](https://github.com/bcnmy/nexus/wiki#problems-nexus-solves), it is not noted that Nexus suite will be ERC7484 compliant.
Appeal created
finding-ERC7484-sorted-duplicate-attestor-issue
Invalid, similar issue to #151 and duplicates - Addition of attesters are admin only functionalities so if duplicate addresses are added it would consitute admin input/call validation. - ERC-7484 is in draft mode so we should not take it as the final EIP configuration yet. - In the [documentation](https://github.com/bcnmy/nexus/wiki#problems-nexus-solves), it is not noted that Nexus suite will be ERC7484 compliant.
Prize pool breakdown
Live
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
Community Judging
Submissions are being reviewed by the community.
Appeals
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals Review
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.