The setDaoExecutor
function in your Solidity contract allows for the setting of a DAO executor address, which is a critical role responsible for important contract functions. However, the function currently sets the new DAO executor immediately without any intermediate checks or confirmations, potentially allowing a compromised or incorrect address to assume the DAO executor role unexpectedly.
The vulnerability stems from the following aspects of the setDaoExecutor
function:
Single-Step Ownership Transfer: The function directly assigns _daoExecutor
as the new DAO executor without any additional confirmation steps or checks beyond the initial validation (_daoExecutor != address(0)
). This immediate assignment can lead to unintended consequences if the address is incorrect or compromised.
Role Significance: The DAO executor role holds significant authority over critical contract operations, such as configuring auctions or recovering tokens. Granting this role incorrectly or to an unauthorized address can compromise contract security and operational integrity.
The impact of this vulnerability could be severe:
Unauthorized Access: Assigning DAO executorship to an incorrect or compromised address could grant unauthorized access to critical contract functions, potentially leading to misuse or manipulation of contract state and assets.
Manual review
To mitigate this issue, consider the following recommendations:
Two-Step Ownership Transfer: Implement a two-step process for transferring DAO executorship. This could involve initial proposal or nomination followed by confirmation or multi-signature approval by existing DAO executors or governance participants.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.