This audit report identifies a critical issue in the ThePredicter
smart contract: there is no mechanism to prioritize the approval of Ivan and his 15 friends as players, as stated in the documentation. This discrepancy between the documentation and the code can lead to potential issues in ensuring that Ivan and his friends are guaranteed participation in the betting system.
Documentation Claim: According to the provided documentation, the protocol should allow the Organizer (Ivan) to prioritize the approval of himself and his 15 friends as players. This is important to ensure that these 16 trusted individuals are always included in the tournament.
Code Review: Upon reviewing the ThePredicter
smart contract, it is evident that there is no specific mechanism to give priority approval to Ivan and his 15 friends. The approvePlayer
function treats all pending users equally, without any distinction or priority:
Without a priority approval mechanism, there is no guarantee that Ivan and his 15 friends will be approved as players if there are many registrations. This could lead to situations where these trusted participants are unable to join the tournament, potentially compromising the intended operation and security of the system.
manual review
To align the code with the documentation and ensure the intended priority approval mechanism, we recommend implementing a method to guarantee that Ivan and his 15 friends are always approved as players. Here are the proposed changes:
Add a List of Trusted Addresses: Define a list of trusted addresses (Ivan and his 15 friends) in the contract.
Modify the approvePlayer
Function: Implement a mechanism to check if the address belongs to the list of trusted addresses and prioritize their approval.
Implementing a priority approval mechanism for Ivan and his 15 friends will ensure the integrity and intended operation of the ThePredicter
contract. This enhancement will align the code with the documentation, guaranteeing that these trusted participants are always included in the tournament, thus maintaining the security and reliability of the protocol.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.