The TradingAccountBranch contract is susceptible to dust attacks due to the absence of minimum deposit and withdrawal limits, as well as the lack of transaction rate limiting. This vulnerability could potentially be exploited to degrade contract performance, increase gas costs for other users, and manipulate market dynamics.
The depositMargin
and withdrawMargin
functions allow for transactions of any non-zero amount. There is no mechanism to limit the frequency of transactions for a single account and it uses complex financial calculations that could potentially be manipulated by many small transactions.
Numerous small transactions can increase the gas costs for all users interacting with the contract.
State Bloat: Many small balance entries could bloat the contract's state, leading to higher operational costs over time.
Economic Attacks: Potential manipulation of market dynamics or exploitation of rounding errors in financial calculations.
Griefing: An attacker could use dust transactions to congest the network or make the contract less usable for legitimate users.
Performance Degradation: Processing many small transactions could lead to decreased performance of the contract and associated systems.
Manual code review
Implement minimum deposit and withdrawal amounts for each collateral type.
These minimums should be configurable by the contract owner to allow for adjustments based on market conditions.
Add a cooldown period between transactions for each account.
This prevents rapid successive small deposits or withdrawals from a single account.
Strengthen input validation to reject transactions that don't meet the new criteria.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.