Description: In the context of the ContestManager.sol
contract, the primary concern would arise if the Pot.sol
contract (which is interacted with by ContestManager) handles Ether or interacts with other external contracts in a way that could allow reentrant calls.
Impact:
Unauthorized Access: An attacker could exploit reentrancy to repeatedly call functions, potentially bypassing access controls or logic checks.
State Manipulation: The contract's state could be manipulated in unexpected ways, leading to incorrect contest results or fund distribution.
Financial Loss: If funds are involved, reentrancy could lead to unauthorized withdrawals or transfers.
Proof of Concept: Assuming the Pot
contract has a vulnerability, here's a simplified example of how reentrancy might be exploited:
Recommended Mitigation:
Implement Reentrancy Guards:
Use OpenZeppelin's ReentrancyGuard to protect functions that could be vulnerable to reentrancy attacks.
Apply the nonReentrant modifier to functions in the Pot contract that handle token transfers or external calls.
Use SafeERC20 Library:
Replace direct ERC20 operations with OpenZeppelin's SafeERC20 library to handle token transfers safely.
This ensures proper error handling and prevents silent failures.
Add Address Validation:
Ensure that addresses being assigned or used in critical operations are not address(0).
Implement checks in functions to validate input addresses
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.