The code generates a pseudo-random number using block.timestamp and msg.sender, but this approach is not secure for scenarios requiring unpredictable randomness. The inputs used can be influenced by miners or participants, making the randomness predictable.
The current implementation for generating randomness uses the keccak256 function with block.timestamp and msg.sender as inputs. While this might suffice for non-critical randomness needs, both block.timestamp and msg.sender are not truly random and can be influenced.
For example:
Miners can manipulate the block timestamp within a limited range.
Malicious users can attempt to generate transactions at specific times, altering the msg.sender input.
This can lead to predictable outcomes in applications requiring strong randomness, such as lotteries or games, where fairness and unpredictability are critical.
Potential manipulation of outcomes in lotteries, raffles, or any application that depends on fair randomness.
Exploitation by malicious actors to tilt the results in their favor.
Manual Review
For stronger and more secure randomness, consider integrating a Verifiable Randomness mechanism like Chainlink VRF (Verifiable Random Function). Chainlink VRF provides cryptographically secure and verifiable randomness that is resistant to manipulation, ensuring the fairness and unpredictability of outcomes in critical applications.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.