Mystery Box

First Flight #25
Beginner FriendlyFoundry
100 EXP
View results
Submission Details
Severity: low
Invalid

[L-1] Lack of Events for Transparency and Monitoring

Description

The MysteryBox contract lacks the implementation of events to log significant actions and state changes within the contract. Events in Solidity serve as a means to emit logs that can be easily monitored and tracked by off-chain applications, users, and developers. Without these events, critical actions such as purchasing a box, opening a box, adding rewards, changing the box price, transferring ownership, and withdrawing funds do not generate observable logs on the blockchain. This absence hinders the ability to monitor and verify the contract’s operations in real-time.

Vulnerability Details

Impact

The lack of events in the MysteryBox contract leads to several drawbacks related to transparency and ease of monitoring:

1. Reduced Transparency:

User Trust: Users cannot easily verify actions taken within the contract, such as box purchases or reward distributions, leading to decreased trust in the contract’s fairness and reliability.

Auditability: Auditors and third parties have limited visibility into the contract’s operations, making it more challenging to perform comprehensive reviews and ensure compliance with expected behaviors.

2. Difficulty in Monitoring:

Real-Time Tracking: Without events, developers and users cannot monitor contract interactions in real-time, making it harder to detect and respond to anomalies or suspicious activities promptly.

Analytics and Reporting: Building analytics dashboards or generating reports based on contract interactions becomes more cumbersome, as off-chain systems rely on event logs to aggregate and process data efficiently.

3. Enhanced Debugging Challenges:

Issue Diagnosis: Identifying and diagnosing issues within the contract is more difficult without event logs, as developers lack insights into the sequence of actions and state changes that occur during contract execution.

4. Integration Limitations:

Third-Party Services: Integrating with external services, wallets, or decentralized applications (dApps) is less efficient without events, as these integrations often rely on event data to trigger specific functionalities or updates.

Tools Used

Manual Code Review:

Analyzing the smart contract’s source code to identify the absence of event declarations and emissions.

Recommendations

Implement Events for Critical Functions:

Introduce events in functions that perform significant actions to enhance transparency and facilitate monitoring.

Example Events:

event BoxPurchased(address indexed buyer, uint256 amount);
event BoxOpened(address indexed opener, string rewardName, uint256 rewardValue);
event RewardAdded(string name, uint256 value);
event BoxPriceChanged(uint256 oldPrice, uint256 newPrice);
event OwnershipTransferred(address indexed previousOwner, address indexed newOwner);
event FundsWithdrawn(address indexed owner, uint256 amount);
Updates

Appeal created

inallhonesty Lead Judge 11 months ago
Submission Judgement Published
Invalidated
Reason: Non-acceptable severity

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.