The MysteryBox contract lacks proper input validation in several critical functions, potentially leading to unexpected behavior or economic imbalances.
The following functions have insufficient input validation:
setBoxPrice
: No check for zero or unreasonably high prices
addReward
: No validation for reward name or value
buyBox
: No limit on the number of boxes that can be purchased at once
Potential economic imbalances if prices or rewards are set to extreme values
Possible system abuse through bulk purchases
Increased risk of user errors leading to unintended consequences
Manual code review
Implement input validation in setBoxPrice
:
Check for non-zero price
Set a reasonable maximum price
Add validation in addReward
:
Ensure reward name is not empty
Set minimum and maximum values for rewards
Implement purchase limits in buyBox
:
Set a maximum number of boxes that can be purchased in a single transaction
Consider adding a maximum supply of boxes to prevent infinite minting
By implementing these recommendations, the contract will be more robust against potential misuse and unintended behaviors, enhancing overall system integrity and user experience.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.