President Elector

First Flight #24
Beginner FriendlyFoundry
100 EXP
View results
Submission Details
Severity: low
Invalid

Lack of NatSpec Comments

Summary

The RankedChoice contract lacks NatSpec comments, which are a highly recommended practice in Solidity for providing comprehensive and structured documentation.

Description

While the contract is functional and readable, it does not utilize the Solidity NatSpec (Ethereum Natural Specification Format) standard for documenting functions, parameters, and return values. NatSpec comments are essential for ensuring that anyone interacting with the contract understands the intention behind each function, its parameters, and the outputs it produces.

NatSpec is also useful for developers interacting with the contract via tools like Etherscan or Remix, providing them with contextual information about the contract’s behavior without needing to dive into the source code.

Tools Used

manual review

Recommendations

  1. Adopt NatSpec Standard: Ensure that all public and external functions in the contract are documented using the NatSpec format. This includes describing the purpose of the function, parameters, and return values, and noting any potential risks or requirements.

    /// @notice Cast a ranked vote for candidates in a specific order
    /// @param orderedCandidates An array of candidate addresses ranked by preference
    /// @dev Voters use this function to submit their ranked choices for president
    function rankCandidates(address[] memory orderedCandidates) external {
    // Code logic...
    }
Updates

Lead Judging Commences

inallhonesty Lead Judge 9 months ago
Submission Judgement Published
Invalidated
Reason: Non-acceptable severity

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.