The rankCandidatesBySig function is vulnerable to signature replay attacks due to the absence of proper nonce management and other essential EIP-712 safeguards. This vulnerability could allow malicious actors to reuse valid signatures, potentially manipulating the voting process in favor of certain candidates.
Lack of Nonce: The function does not implement a nonce system, allowing signatures to be reused multiple times.
Missing ChainID: The absence of chainId in the signed message enables cross-chain replay attacks.
No Expiration Mechanism: Without a deadline or expiration timestamp, signatures remain valid indefinitely.
Incomplete EIP-712 Implementation: The contract does not fully adhere to the EIP-712 standard, missing crucial elements like a properly structured domain separator.
These vulnerabilities collectively undermine the integrity of the signature-based voting system, potentially allowing attackers to:
Replay votes multiple times
Use signatures across different blockchain networks
Exploit old signatures that should no longer be valid
Use of old signatures in favor of particular contestant will compromise the fairness and integrity of the voting system, potentially leading to illegitimate election outcomes.
Manual Review
It can be fixed by one of the following ways:
Implement Nonce System:
Add a nonce for each voter: mapping(address => uint256) private _nonces;
Include nonce in the signed message structure.
Verify and increment nonce in rankCandidatesBySig
Add ChainID to Signed Message:
Include block.chainid in the message hash to prevent cross-chain replays.
Implement Expiration Mechanism:
Add a deadline parameter to the signed message.
Check block.timestamp against the deadline in rankCandidatesBySig.
Fully Implement EIP-712:
Create a proper domain separator including contract name, version, chainId, and contract address.
Use structured data hashing as per EIP-712 specification.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.