The RewardsPool
contract is susceptible to a reentrancy attack due to the lack of proper reentrancy protection mechanisms. This vulnerability allows an attacker to repeatedly call a function before the previous execution is completed, potentially leading to unauthorized withdrawals and significant financial loss.
Reentrancy attacks occur when a contract makes an external call to another untrusted contract before updating its state. If the untrusted contract calls back into the original contract, it can execute the function multiple times before the state is updated, leading to unintended behavior.
In the RewardsPool
contract, the withdraw
function (or similar functions handling external calls) lacks the nonReentrant
modifier, which is crucial for preventing reentrancy attacks. This oversight allows an attacker to exploit the function by calling it recursively, draining funds from the contract.
The impact of this vulnerability is severe, as it can lead to:
Unauthorized withdrawal of funds from the contract.
Potential loss of all funds held within the contract.
Damage to the reputation of the project and loss of user trust.
Manual
Implement Reentrancy Guard: Use OpenZeppelin's ReentrancyGuard
to protect functions that are vulnerable to reentrancy. This involves inheriting from ReentrancyGuard
and applying the nonReentrant
modifier to functions like withdraw
.
Follow Checks-Effects-Interactions Pattern: Ensure that all state changes are made before any external calls. This pattern helps prevent reentrancy by updating the contract's state before interacting with other contracts.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.