The provided code is a set of tests for an Ethereum smart contract using Hardhat and Chai. It tests the upgradeability of a strategy contract (likely a DeFi strategy) while ensuring that state persists across upgrades. Here are some potential vulnerabilities and improvements for the code, along with detailed solutions:
Lack of Reentrancy Protection:
Vulnerability: If the deposit function in the StrategyMock contract does not implement reentrancy protection, it could be vulnerable to reentrancy attacks, especially if external calls (like transferring tokens) are made.
Improvement: Use the ReentrancyGuard from OpenZeppelin to protect the deposit function.
Solution:
Token Approval Risks:
Vulnerability: Approving the strategy contract to spend an infinite amount of tokens (ethers.MaxUint256) may expose users to risks if the strategy's implementation is compromised.
Improvement: Approve only the required amount of tokens or implement a withdraw mechanism that allows users to reset approvals.
Solution:
Missing Events:
Vulnerability: The code does not verify that important state changes (like deposits and upgrades) emit corresponding events, which are crucial for external observers and dApps to track changes.
Improvement: Ensure that the deposit, upgradeTo, and other state-changing functions emit appropriate events.
Solution:
Testing Edge Cases:
Vulnerability: The tests only cover basic functionality but don't check for edge cases, such as upgrading multiple times or re-depositing after an upgrade.
Improvement: Add tests to cover scenarios like multiple upgrades, reentrancy, or deposits after an upgrade.
Solution:
Inconsistent Use of assert and expect:
Vulnerability: The code uses both assert and expect, which may lead to inconsistency in testing practices.
Improvement: Stick to one style (preferably expect) for clarity and consistency.
Solution:
Replace assertions like:
with:
Here’s a snippet of how the improved test suite might look:
The improvements focus on enhancing security, maintaining consistent testing practices, and ensuring that the code adheres to best practices in smart contract development. By implementing these changes, you can create a more robust and secure smart contract.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.