In the LLMOracleCoordinator::getBestResponse function, all results from a request are iterated to find the response with the highest score. This function is intended to select the best response based on scores assigned by validators. However, if there are no validators available for a given request, the function defaults to returning the first generated response. This introduces potential bias, as it fails to objectively determine the best response in the absence of validators.
Consider a scenario where:
A BuyerAgent initiates a request.
Ten generators produce responses, and the request is considered complete.
When the BuyerAgent calls getBestResponse, the function will return the first response by default, since no validators exist to evaluate and score the responses.
In this situation, the system fails to apply an unbiased selection process, potentially leading to unintended or suboptimal results for requests with zero validators.
This flaw can lead to biased and potentially inaccurate response selection for requests without validators. It could create an unfair advantage for responses generated first, regardless of quality. If exploited, malicious generators could submit low-quality responses early, knowing they would be selected in the absence of validation. This bias could erode trust in the system's reliability and quality, especially for critical requests.
Manual Review
To address this issue, implement the following mechanism to ensure fair selection when no validators are available:
Randomized Selection in Absence of Validators: On the first invocation of getBestResponse for requests without validators, generate a random index to select one of the generated responses.
Cache Random Index: Store the generated index to ensure consistency for subsequent calls to getBestResponse for the same request. This avoids re-selecting a different response upon each invocation and maintains stable results across repeated queries.
By implementing this approach, the function will avoid bias toward the first response and ensure fairer selection, even in validator-free scenarios.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.