The protocol uses a single fee model for all LLM models, despite significant cost variations between different models. For example:
GPT-4 costs approximately $0.03/1K tokens
GPT-3.5 costs approximately $0.0005/1K tokens
Claude 3 Opus costs $0.015/1K tokens
Claude 3 Sonnet costs $0.003/1K tokens
This means that validators running more expensive models like GPT-4 will have significantly higher operational costs compared to those running cheaper models like GPT-3.5, yet they receive the same compensation.
In LLMOracleManager.sol, the fee structure is model-agnostic:
LLMOracleManager.sol#L105-L120
Validators are disincentivized from using more expensive (and potentially more capable) models
Validators using expensive models may operate at a loss
The protocol may end up with most validators using only the cheapest models, reducing the diversity and quality of responses
This could lead to a "race to the bottom" where validators optimize for cost rather than quality
Implement model-specific fees that reflect the actual costs of different LLMs.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.