The purchase()
function in the BuyerAgent
contract trusts the output from the oracle without any validation. A malicious oracle could return an arbitrary list of assets, causing the buyer to purchase unintended assets.
The BuyerAgent
contract's purchase()
function executes purchases based on the oracle's output without performing any validation checks. This lack of validation allows a malicious oracle to manipulate the buyer agent's purchases by returning arbitrary asset addresses.
In the purchase()
function of the BuyerAgent
contract, the asset addresses to be purchased are directly obtained from the oracle's output using abi.decode(output, (address[]))
. The function then proceeds to purchase these assets without verifying if they meet the buyer's intended criteria or if they are legitimate assets within the Swan protocol.
A malicious oracle could exploit this vulnerability to manipulate a buyer agent's purchases, causing the agent to spend its funds on undesirable or fraudulent assets. This could lead to financial losses for the buyer and potentially drain the agent's balance.
Manual code review
To mitigate this vulnerability, it is recommended to add validation checks on the oracle's output within the purchase()
function. These checks should ensure that the assets returned by the oracle meet the buyer's predefined criteria and are valid assets within the Swan protocol. Additionally, implementing a mechanism to verify the integrity and authenticity of the oracle responses can further enhance the security of the purchasing process.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.