Inaccurate Documentation Reference in trickOrTreat Function
Description
The trickOrTreat function currently references a non-existent function fellForTrick() in its comments in line 91, stating: User needs to call fellForTrick() to finish the transaction. However, the correct function that users need to call is actually resolveTrick().
Impact
This inconsistency could lead to confusion for developers and users who rely on the code comments to understand transaction flows. Misleading documentation could cause users to overlook the resolveTrick function and fail to complete the transaction correctly, potentially resulting in failed interactions with the contract, or developers might have to spend time debugging issues that could have been avoided with accurate documentation.
Recommended Mitigation
Update the comment to reference resolveTrick() instead of fellForTrick():
Appeal created
[invalid] Wrong comment
This is an informational issue.
Rewards breakdown
Live
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
Appeals
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals Review
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.