Submission Details
Severity:
Incorrect Contract Comment Refers to a Non-Existent Function
Description: In the contract documentation, a comment incorrectly references a function named SkoopySwap::fellForTrick, which does not exist. The intended function appears to be SkoopySwap::resolveTrick, which fulfills the relevant functionality.
// User needs to call fellForTrick() to finish the transaction
Recommended Mitigation: This comments line creates confusion and should be removed or corrected with the resolveTrick function name.
Updates
Appeal created
bube 10 months ago
Submission Judgement Published Reason: Non-acceptable severity
Assigned finding tags:
[invalid] Wrong comment
This is an informational issue.
Rewards breakdown
nSLOC
109This contest has a flat reward structure with the following payouts:
100 EXP
20 EXP
2 EXP
Live
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
Appeals
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals Review
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.