The MembershipERC1155
contract is designed to be an upgradeable ERC1155 token for DAO memberships, allowing flexibility in adding new features or modifying the contract logic in future upgrades. However, despite inheriting from OpenZeppelin's upgradeable base contracts and using an initialize
function, the contract lacks a necessary upgradeability mechanism, such as the UUPSUpgradeable
module or deployment through a proxy. This oversight creates a critical flaw: the contract is deployed as non-upgradeable, preventing updates to its logic once deployed. Consequently, any bugs, security vulnerabilities, or required functional optimizations cannot be addressed without redeploying a new contract, which would require users to migrate manually.
In the MembershipERC1155
contract, several signs suggest an intention for upgradeability, including the use of OpenZeppelin’s upgradeable base contracts like ERC1155Upgradeable
and AccessControlUpgradeable
, and the initializer
modifier in place of a constructor. However, the contract does not inherit from UUPSUpgradeable
or any similar upgradeability module, nor is it deployed through a proxy, leaving no means for an upgrade.
Without implementing an actual upgrade pattern, the contract cannot be redeployed with updated logic, thus failing to meet the expected upgradeability functionality. This design flaw could severely impact the protocol's ability to maintain or optimize the contract over time.
The contract is intended to be upgradeable to facilitate optimizations, bug fixes, or new features. However, this intention is not realized due to the missing upgrade mechanism, breaking a critical protocol assumption that this contract is flexible and upgradable. In its current form, the contract is essentially immutable after deployment, leading to a potential need for redeployment in the event of any issues. This could expose the protocol to significant operational risks, as any critical bugs or vulnerabilities would require the deployment of a new contract and manual user migration, which is both costly and disruptive.
None
To ensure the contract can be upgraded in future, we recommend implementing one of the following steps:
Add UUPSUpgradeable Inheritance: Modify the contract to inherit from UUPSUpgradeable
and implement the _authorizeUpgrade
function to restrict upgrade authorization. This allows the contract to be upgradeable through a UUPS proxy.
Use a Proxy Deployment: Deploy the contract via an upgradeable proxy, ensuring that it can point to a new implementation contract in the future.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.