While the protocol provides membership and profit-sharing mechanisms, it critically lacks a governance system that would allow members to participate in decision-making. A core feature of any DAO is the ability for token holders to propose and vote on changes, yet the current implementation offers no such functionality, effectively centralizing all control with the administrators.
1. The protocol only implements basic membership features through ERC1155 tokens
2. No governance mechanisms
3. Token holders lack voting capabilities despite having financial stake
1. All decisions require administrator action
2. Members cannot influence protocol development
Manual Review
1. Design and implement a comprehensive proposal system
2. Add voting weight calculation based on token tiers
3. Implement proposal execution timelock for security
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.