The unchecked external call vulnerability exists in the callExternalContract
function of the MembershipFactory
contract. The issue arises from the use of contractAddress.call{value: msg.value}(data)
to perform external calls without properly handling the possibility of reentrancy attacks or malicious contract responses. While the function includes a check for the success of the call (require(success, "External call failed")
), it does not address the broader risks associated with untrusted external calls.
In the function callExternalContract
, an external contract is called with a specified contractAddress
and data
. This external call is done via the low-level .call()
function, which is prone to reentrancy vulnerabilities, especially when interacting with contracts that can alter the flow of control back to the calling contract before completing execution.
The call
function allows for arbitrary code execution, and if the external contract is malicious or improperly written, it can reenter the MembershipFactory
contract during the execution of the external call, manipulating state variables or performing unexpected actions, such as draining funds or executing unexpected actions in the caller contract.
The impact of this vulnerability can be severe:
Reentrancy Attacks: If the called contract is malicious and is able to call back into the MembershipFactory
contract before the first call completes, the attacker could manipulate the state of the contract or drain funds (for instance, if the external call involves any ether or token transfer).
Denial of Service (DoS): Malicious external contracts could also cause the callExternalContract
function to fail or freeze operations by making the call non-terminating or always fail. This could result in service interruptions, preventing legitimate users from interacting with the contract.
Untrusted Call Risk: Since the contract does not verify or sanitize the behavior of the external contract, an attacker could call a contract that performs harmful actions within the same transaction.
Static Analysis: Manual inspection of the contract code for potential vulnerabilities.
Solidity Compiler Warnings: Review of compiler output to identify any common pitfalls like unhandled exceptions.
Etherscan & MythX: Tools like MythX for deeper analysis of known vulnerabilities in smart contract patterns.
Slither: Automated analysis tool for static analysis, used to identify potential reentrancy and untrusted external call vulnerabilities.
To mitigate this vulnerability, follow these steps:
Use a Reentrancy Guard: Implement a reentrancy guard pattern to ensure that no external calls are made when the contract state is being modified. This can be done by using ReentrancyGuard
from OpenZeppelin or creating a custom modifier.
Avoid Low-Level Calls: Instead of using low-level .call()
to interact with external contracts, use higher-level functions like IERC20.transfer()
or IERC20.transferFrom()
where applicable, as they do not expose the contract to the same reentrancy risks.
Check the Returned Data: Ensure that any external contract call has its return data validated, especially when interacting with token transfers or contract state changes.
Limit the Scope of External Calls: Use tighter access control on callExternalContract
to limit which addresses can invoke it. For instance, restricting this function to a whitelist of trusted contracts could minimize the impact of an attack.
Gas Stipend Safety: If a call to an external contract involves Ether transfer (via msg.value
), ensure that no sensitive contract state can be modified as a result of the transfer. Consider using the transfer
function instead of call{value}
to limit the gas stipend.
An attacker could exploit the unchecked external call to trigger a reentrancy attack or manipulate the contract state.
Attacker: A malicious contract that exploits the vulnerability by calling back into the MembershipFactory
contract.
Victim: The MembershipFactory
contract, which is vulnerable to unexpected behavior due to unchecked external calls.
Protocol: The Membership DAO protocol, which is intended to manage memberships and DAOs securely.
A malicious attacker deploys a contract that calls callExternalContract
and re-enters the MembershipFactory
contract, causing unexpected state changes or fund draining.
The attacker deploys the MaliciousContract
with the address of the vulnerable MembershipFactory
contract.
The attacker calls attack()
on the malicious contract.
The callExternalContract
function in the MembershipFactory
contract invokes the malicious contract.
The malicious contract's fallback function is triggered, and it calls the MembershipFactory
contract again, potentially manipulating its state or draining funds.
The malicious attacker uses the callExternalContract
to invoke the fallback
function in their contract.
During the execution of the fallback function, the attacker can invoke another function of the vulnerable contract, thus exploiting the reentrancy flaw.
Use transfer
instead of call{value: msg.value}
for transferring funds to minimize gas allowance issues and avoid reentrancy.
Add a Reentrancy Guard:
Verify External Calls: Ensure that external calls are made to trusted contracts and include checks on returned data for additional safety.
Risk Type: High
The vulnerability can lead to reentrancy attacks, allowing an attacker to manipulate contract state or drain funds, resulting in severe financial loss or protocol compromise.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.