The contract does not support a payable constructor, receive(), or fallback() functions, rendering it essentially unplayable. Additionally, there is no mechanism to withdraw funds from the contract, causing any forfeited user Ether to remain permanently stuck.
The contract lacks a straightforward way for the owner to fund the initial prize pool or withdraw rewards. While some workarounds exist, they are not intuitive, not documented as expected behavior, and may lead to undesirable consequences.
Using startGame() with Sufficient ETH:
The owner could deploy the contract with no initial balance and fund it later by calling the startGame() function with enough Ether. However:
This approach requires unnecessary transactions.
It starts a game for the owner, which is not ideal.
There is no guarantee that another player will not have already played the game.
Deploying to a Pre-Funded Address:
The owner could deploy the contract to a predetermined address with existing ETH. However, this:
Requires advanced techniques.
Is not feasible in all cases.
Additionally, the inability to withdraw funds might be intentional but is uncommon and not explicitly stated in the contract documentation.
The game cannot be properly started or played if the TwentyOne contract has insufficient funds.
Manual Review
Foundry
ChatGPT
Implement a Payable Constructor:
Allow the deployer to set the initial contract balance upon deployment. Example:
Add receive() and fallback() Functions:
Enable the contract to receive funds directly and allow users to provide tips. Example:
Implement a Withdrawal Mechanism:
Allow the contract owner to withdraw forfeited funds while ensuring the contract retains sufficient balance for gameplay. Use OpenZeppelin's Ownable and onlyOwner for this. Example:
Expose contract balance:
Update Documentation:
Clearly document the intended methods for funding and withdrawing, and highlight any limitations or intentional design choices.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.