The TwentyOne
contract lacks mechanisms to ensure that it maintains sufficient funds to cover
all potential reward payouts to the first users
of the contract .
The current implementation of the smart contract presents several critical problems that undermine its functionality and economic model:
Absence of a constructor
: The contract lacks a constructor function with the payable
modifier, which is essential for receiving initial funding during deployment. This omission means the contract will be deployed without any initial capital. Due to the lack of a custom constructor, the contract assumes the default constructor
is (constructor() {}
), which is not capable of accepting payments.
Missing receive function
: The absence of a receive()
function prevents direct funding of the contract through Ether transfers.
Funding dependency
: The contract's ability to distribute rewards is entirely dependent on players losing funds
, rather than having a dedicated funding mechanism.
Initial player disadvantage
: The first players will face significant challenges in participating, as the contract lacks sufficient funds to cover potential rewards.
Economic instability
: The lack of a stable funding source jeopardizes the entire reward structure, potentially leaving players without compensation.
Manual code review.
To address these issues, the following changes should be considered:
Implement a custom constructor with the payable
modifier to receive initial funding. Add a receive()
function to enable direct Ether transfers to the contract.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.