The ChritsmasDinner::deposit function can also be targeted for a Denial of Service (DOS) attack. By repeatedly calling the ChritsmasDinner::deposit function, a malicious actor could overload the system, increasing the cost of processing legitimate deposits for other users. This could prevent genuine users from interacting with the contract or make it prohibitively expensive.
Proof of Concept:
Legitimate users could face higher gas fees or be unable to deposit tokens due to the malicious actor's repeated calls to the ChritsmasDinner::deposit function. This would disrupt the fair operation of the contract and discourage participation in the event.
aderyn, slither, manual, forge
Implement a rate limit for deposit requests or introduce a transaction fee to dissuade spamming.
Consider adding a cool-off period between deposit transactions.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.