In the ChristmasDinner::deposit function, there is no check to ensure that the value of _amount is greater than zero, allowing attackers to become a participant by passing _amount=0 without actually paying any funds. This vulnerability could be exploited maliciously, impacting the fairness and integrity of the contract.
The ChristmasDinner::deposit function does not verify whether the _amount parameter is greater than zero. An attacker can exploit this by passing _amount=0 to bypass the actual transfer of funds while still becoming a participant. In this case, the attacker can enjoy the privileges or features within the contract without contributing any funds.
The lack of strict validation for input values, especially those related to funds, exposes potential risks in fund management and access control, which may be abused to achieve unfair advantages.
Abuse of Contract Features: An attacker can become a participant by paying _amount=0, potentially gaining access to certain exclusive features or privileges.
Financial Loss: If the contract relies on participant status for fund allocation or benefits, this vulnerability may harm the interests of actual contributors.
Damage to System Integrity: The contract's reputation and participant trust could be damaged due to exploitation of this vulnerability, reducing community engagement.
Manual review.
Add a check in the deposit function to ensure that _amount is greater than zero.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.