An unsafe operation involving an ERC20 token transfer was found in the contract. The vulnerability stems from using a standard ERC20 transfer function without proper error handling, which could lead to unexpected behavior or security issues.
Location: Line 235 in src/ChristmasDinner.sol
Type: Unsafe ERC20 operation
Description: The contract uses _to.transfer(refundValue) to transfer tokens, which lacks proper error handling and return value checking.
Potential loss of tokens: If the transfer fails silently (some ERC20 tokens don't return values), the contract won't detect the failure.
Unexpected behavior: The contract's logic might assume a successful transfer when it actually fails.
Security risks: Malicious actors could exploit the lack of error handling to manipulate token transfers.
Slither static analysis tool identified this vulnerability.
Replace the current transfer function with OpenZeppelin's SafeERC20 library.
Implement proper error handling and return value checking for token transfers.
Review all instances of token transfers in the contract and apply similar safety measures.
Implement a fallback mechanism for cases where the token doesn't support return values.
Consider using a custom ERC20 wrapper contract that implements SafeERC20 patterns consistently across the project.
By addressing this vulnerability, you'll significantly improve the security and reliability of your smart contract when interacting with ERC20 tokens.
ERC20 functions may not behave as expected. For example: return values are not always meaningful. It is recommended to use OpenZeppelin's SafeERC20 library.
Found in src/ChristmasDinner.sol Line: 235
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.