Root cause plus impact: The contract contains functions that perform multiple external calls before internal state changes, potentially allowing reentrancy attacks that could lead to unauthorized access or funds loss.
I identified potential reentrancy vulnerabilities in several functions within the contract, including _handleTokenOperations, _redeemWTokenPrivate, and _claimYield. These functions perform multiple external calls before making internal state changes, creating an opportunity for malicious actors to exploit reentrancy attacks.
_handleTokenOperations:
Performs multiple external calls before updating internal state
Potential for reentrancy if called by malicious contracts
_redeemWTokenPrivate:
Executes external calls before updating internal balances
Could be exploited if called repeatedly during transaction execution
_claimYield:
Makes external calls before finalizing yield calculations
Susceptible to reentrancy if used improperly
The root cause of these vulnerabilities stems from the order of operations in the affected functions. They perform external interactions (calls to other contracts or addresses) before completing their internal logic and state updates. This sequence allows for potential reentrancy if called by malicious contracts with fallback functions that can trigger repeated calls.
If exploited, these vulnerabilities could lead to:
Unauthorized access to sensitive operations
Potential loss of funds through repeated withdrawals
Unexpected state changes in the contract
Compromise of the entire system's security and integrity
To analyze this finding, I used:
Solidity static analysis tools ( Slither, Mythril)
Formal verification tools
Manual code review
To demonstrate the potential impact, we simulated a reentrancy attack using Hardhat:
This simulation demonstrates how an attacker could repeatedly call handleTokenOperations while the transaction is still executing, potentially draining funds without updating balances.
To mitigate these vulnerabilities, consider implementing the following:
Use OpenZeppelin's ReentrancyGuard library:
Apply the nonReentrant modifier to vulnerable functions:
Follow the Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern:
Perform checks first
Update state variables second
Interact with external contracts last
Consider using a pull payment pattern instead of push payments for sensitive operations.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.