The codebase lacks proper documentation in the form of docstrings for several contracts, functions, and events. This makes it challenging for developers and auditors to fully understand the intended behavior, increasing the risk of misimplementation and undetected vulnerabilities.
Docstrings are missing for several contracts, functions, and events across the codebase, which poses challenges for developers and auditors trying to understand the functionality and usage of these components. Lack of documentation can lead to misinterpretation, improper implementation, or insufficient auditing, increasing the likelihood of introducing vulnerabilities or bugs.
Notable instances include:
AaveDIVAWrapper.sol: Missing documentation for the AaveDIVAWrapper
contract and its batch-related functions, such as batchRegisterCollateralToken
, batchCreateContingentPool
, and others.
IAave.sol: The IAave
interface lacks detailed descriptions of its functionality.
IAaveDIVAWrapper.sol: Missing docstrings for events such as PoolIssued
, YieldClaimed
, and others.
IDIVA.sol: Events like PoolIssued
and LiquidityAdded
lack documentation.
MockERC20.sol and MockUSDTEthereum.sol: Core functions such as decimals
, mint
, approve
, and others lack explanations, leaving gaps in understanding the token behavior.
The absence of docstrings makes it difficult to:
Ensure clarity about function inputs, outputs, and behaviors.
Enable effective auditing and testing of the code.
Facilitate onboarding for new developers or contributors.
Communicate potential risks or nuances in sensitive functionality.
Undocumented code increases the risk of introducing bugs, security vulnerabilities, and misunderstandings during integrations.
Highly likely, as developers, auditors, or integrators might misinterpret or overlook critical functionality due to missing documentation. This could lead to misimplementations or failure to detect security risks during audits.
The following is an example of missing documentation:
In AaveDIVAWrapper.sol, the batchRegisterCollateralToken
function has no accompanying docstring to describe:
Expected input parameters.
Its intended behavior or functionality.
Any potential edge cases or errors to be handled.
Thoroughly document all public and external functions, as well as events, using Ethereum's NatSpec format. At a minimum, include:
@notice
: A brief explanation of the function's purpose.
@param
: Description of each parameter and its role.
@return
: Description of the return value(s).
@dev
: Any additional implementation-specific notes or caveats.
Example:
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.