Submission Details
Severity:
Unused Timestamp `uint256 timestamp;` in `LikeRegistry.sol` in likes will create conflict in likes differentiated by small margins. Also likes without timestamps was not the intended functionality.
Summary
The unused timestamp `uint256 timestamp;` was intended in order to track likes chronologically. But the timesamp is missing.
Vulnerability Details
```
@>uint256 timestamp; //Unused timestamp
}
```
Impact
Likes without timestamps was not the contracts intended functionality.
Tools Used
Manual review
Recommendations
Include timestamps for each like.
Updates
Appeal created
n0kto 4 months ago
Submission Judgement Published Reason: Non-acceptable severity
Assigned finding tags:
Informational or Gas
Please read the CodeHawks documentation to know which submissions are valid. If you disagree, provide a coded PoC and explain the real likelyhood and the detailed impact on the mainnet without any supposition (if, it could, etc) to prove your point.
Rewards breakdown
nSLOC
197This contest has a flat reward structure with the following payouts:
100 EXP
20 EXP
2 EXP
Live
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
Appeals
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals Review
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.